In qualitative adjustments, what method ranks properties based on subjective criteria?

The method that ranks properties based on subjective criteria is bracketing analysis. This approach involves assessing a range of properties—both superior and inferior to the subject property—and uses their characteristics and sales prices to create a comparative framework. By evaluating these properties, appraisers can identify where the subject property fits within the subjective range of qualities, such as condition, location, and amenities.

Bracketing analysis allows for nuanced insights that reflect the appraiser's judgment about the desirability and value of properties based on less quantifiable factors. This is particularly important in cases where properties may not have directly comparable sales or where market conditions may vary widely, making purely objective analyses less effective.

The other mentioned methods, such as paired sales, discriminative pricing, and trend analysis, rely more on quantifiable data and statistical relationships rather than personal judgments about the properties in question. Each of these methodologies has its own strengths and is useful in different contexts, but they do not focus on ranking properties based on subjective criteria to the same degree as bracketing analysis.